How do we inhabit space?
Does this question refer to an architect or to the user? What would an artist
say about it? I have always wondered whether an architect is the right person
to judge space and to “compose some kind of manual” for its use. I believe that
space cannot exist without the objects and the subjects that actually activate
it. For Heidegger: “Space is not something opposite of people. It is neither an
eternal object, nor an internal biome. People do not exist with space out of
them”.
Though I have studied
Architecture in the National Technical University of Athens, I have developed
an interest in the objective and more “liberal” qualities of space, that lead
to designing space that overcomes the rational analysis of an architectural
construction programme. Such methods and ideas usually pertain to the mutable
space of imagination and dream, to the psychological and emotional identity of
the user and in general, to research that does not refer to substantial facts
but to perceptual and theoretical qualities. Recently I studied the movement of
the Situationist International and the main ideas of the situationists’
rationale which I found it to be very
related to today’s trends of art, architecture and the digital world. Though I
have not yet defined my research plan for the MA course, I am certain that the
above ideas will influence my work and will help me develop a more artistic way
to analyse and “comment” on the established conventional relation between the
user and space by establishing a new perspective and a dialectical relation
between them, on the verge between art and architecture.
Intricate thoughts Olga. Redefining the correlation between space and user has always been the holy grail of architecture.If one can arrange space based on the "in the objective and more “liberal” qualities" of it he/she will have created something that surpasses the confinements of sheer use purposes.
ReplyDeleteHow have you been?
Koutsipetsidis D.